Up-regulated serum levels of soluble CD25 and soluble CD163 in pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2.

Similar to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), some patients with SARS-CoV-2 have cytokine storm. Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sCD25) and soluble CD163 (sCD163) are potential diagnostic biomarkers for HLH that help in guiding its treatment. This study was the first to investigate serum sCD25 and sCD163 levels in SARS-CoV-2. Serum sCD25 and sCD163 were measured by ELISA in 29 patients with SARS-CoV-2, aged between 2 months and 16 years (13 had COVID-19 and 16 had multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C)), in comparison to 30 age- and sex-matched healthy control children and 10 patients with HLH. Levels of these markers were re-measured in 21 patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were followed up 3 months after recovery. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 had significantly higher serum sCD25 and sCD163 than healthy control children (P < 0.001). SARS-CoV-2 patients had significantly higher sCD25 than patients with HLH (P < 0.05). Serum sCD25 was a good differentiating marker between patients with SARS-CoV-2 and HLH. Although there was a significant decrease of serum sCD25 and sCD163 of the 21 SARS-CoV-2 patients who were followed up, these levels were still significantly higher than the healthy controls levels (P < 0.001).  Conclusion: Serum sCD25 and sCD163 levels were up-regulated in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Serum sCD25 was a good differentiating marker between SARS-CoV-2 and HLH. This initial report requires further studies, on large scales, to investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and both sCD25 and sCD163, including the disease severity and outcome. The therapeutic role of sCD25 and sCD163 antagonists should also be studied in SARS-CoV-2 patients. What is Known: • Similar to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), some patients with COVID-19 have cytokine storm due to excessive pro-inflammatory host response. • Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sCD25) and soluble CD163 (sCD163) are potential diagnostic biomarkers for HLH. Monitoring of serum sCD25 and sCD163 levels can also help in guiding the treatment. What is New: • Serum sCD25 and sCD163 levels are up-regulated in patients with COVID-19, including patients presenting with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). • Serum sCD25 is a good differentiating marker between SARS-CoV-2 and HLH.

Up-regulated serum levels of interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-22 in Egyptian pediatric patients with COVID-19 and MIS-C: Relation to the disease outcome.

Both IL-17A and IL-22 share cellular sources and signaling pathways. They have synergistic action on epithelial cells to stimulate their production of antimicrobial peptides which are protective against infections. However, both interleukins may contribute to ARDS pathology if their production is not controlled. This study aimed to investigate serum levels of IL-17A and IL-22 in relation to the disease outcome in patients with SARS-CoV-2. Serum IL-17A and IL-22 were measured by ELISA in 40 patients with SARS-CoV-2, aged between 2 months and 16 years, (18 had COVID-19 and 22 had multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children "MIS-C") in comparison to 48 age- and sex-matched healthy control children. Patients with COVID-19 and MIS-C had significantly higher serum IL-17A and IL-22 levels than healthy control children (P < 0.001). Increased serum IL-17A and IL-22 levels were found in all patients. Elevated CRP and serum ferritin levels were found in 90% of these patients. Lymphopenia, neutrophilia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and elevated ALT, LDH and D-dimer were found in 45%, 42.5 %, 2.5%, 30%, 32.5%, 82.5%, and 65%, respectively of these patients. There were non-significant differences between patients who recovered and those who died or had a residual illness in serum levels of IL-17A, IL-22 and the routine inflammatory markers of COVID-19. In conclusions, serum IL-17A and IL-22 levels were up-regulated in all patients with COVID-19 and MIS-C. Levels of serum IL-17A, IL-22 and the routine inflammatory markers of COVID-19 were not correlated with the disease outcome. Our conclusions are limited by the sample size.